‘In Defense of Women’, by H.
L. Mencken is a complete study of feminity, covering, The Feminine Mind, The
Maternal Instinct, The Masculine Bag of Tricks, Biological Considerations,
Romance, Marriage, etc.
The book caught my attention
instantly, when I read: “Two of the hardest things that women have to bear are
(a) the stupid masculine disinclination to admit their intellectual
superiority, … and (b) the equally stupid masculine doctrine that they
constitute a special and ineffable species of vertebrate, without the natural
instincts and appetites …, and marked by a complete lack of certain salient
mammalian characters.” I read again “... she talks—of anything, everything, all
the things that women talk of: books, music, the play, men, and other women. No
politics. No business. No religion. No metaphysics. Nothing challenging and
vexatious”
The book is full of “ideas so
novel that they will be instantly rejected as insane and outrageous by all
right thinking men, and so apposite and sound that they will eventually conquer
that instinctive opposition, and force themselves into the traditional wisdom
of the race.” Though the best and most
intellectual in almost all occupations are not men, but women, and they have a
fair share of the best writers, public functionaries, and composers and players of music, man,
by remaining always in full possession of the modest faculties he can claim,
continue to rule this world, the book posits.
The book notes the gradual
emancipation of women that has been going on for the last century. Mainly due
to the changing status of women in USA, such changes have been happening, which
will free them of their traditional burdens and so stand clear of the oppression of men.
Many of the observations made
by the author support the view of women as complete beings, unlike men. The
‘masculine shortfall’, though is not critically examined, supports once again, the view I
have expressed through my book, ‘The Unsure Male’.
No comments:
Post a Comment