Invent a new grammar for a bright future
Whether between
people or between states, what leads to conflict? Unsettled
differences. Why not settle? People do not understand each other
well. Can the issue then be reduced to one of grammar?
I think yes, but in
a more broader sense. Say, a new grammar that embodies the context.
We can think of it
grammar as something that quickly give meaning to what we hear or
say. But context is the thing needed to quickly give relevance to
what we make out of it.
We are fully aware
of the former. It is a part of our education, the way we prepare our
young ones to meet the challenges ahead. It make us confident to
communicate with one another, though there are many instances where
we fail in making each other understood clearly. Presently we are
quite happy with it, while ready to accept all the disturbances and
failures that regularly accompany it. We revel at our successes, and
readily accept excuses for our failures. The most common excuse in
such instances being, to err is human.
When it comes to the
latter, I think we are in the dark. I concede we recognize the
importance of context, but it is limited to instances where one is to
justify, condone, or propagate something inconvenient.
In which case, what
will be pertinent is, rather than what I say or do, the context, that
is, what made me say or do that, shall be understood, and rightly so.
Hence I feel there
is scope for a linguistic revolution. We need to invent words that
can represent all the relevant facets of whichever context, in a
unique manner.
Now, supposing we
did invent such words, what all can we expect?
Whenever we hear
something, what gets registered in us shall be the (hidden) meanings
that are relevant to the context. And when we say something, there
will rarely be an occasion to be at a loss of words.
And the result.
Misunderstandings will be a thing of the past. And no fights, and no
wars.
No comments:
Post a Comment